emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#37291: closed ([PATCHES] Add rust-constant-time-eq


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#37291: closed ([PATCHES] Add rust-constant-time-eq, Update rust-unicode-xid to 0.2.0)
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 08:22:01 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 3 Sep 2019 11:21:30 +0300
with message-id <20190903082130.GR13917@E5400>
and subject line Re: [bug#37291] [PATCHES] Add rust-constant-time-eq, Update 
rust-unicode-xid to 0.2.0
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #37291,
regarding [PATCHES] Add rust-constant-time-eq, Update rust-unicode-xid to 0.2.0
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
37291: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=37291
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCHES] Add rust-constant-time-eq, Update rust-unicode-xid to 0.2.0 Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 23:29:57 +0000 User-agent: Roundcube Webmail

Attachment: 0001-gnu-Add-rust-constant-time-eq.patch
Description: Text Data

Attachment: 0002-gnu-rust-unicode-xid-Update-to-0.2.0.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#37291] [PATCHES] Add rust-constant-time-eq, Update rust-unicode-xid to 0.2.0 Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 11:21:30 +0300 User-agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 07:53:09PM -0700, Ivan Petkov wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > On Sep 2, 2019, at 4:29 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> 
> Have you checked that bumping rust-unicode-xid to 0.2.0 doesn’t break any 
> other rust
> crates which depend on it? I’m not sure if all the imported versions allow 
> building
> with both 0.1.0 and 0.2.0!
> 

It likely does, I'm pretty sure I have some stuff that needs 0.1.

On the other hand, it looks good and rust-constant-time-eq was one I
meant to push anyway. So two patches pushed, and a new
rust-unicode-xid-0.1 variable created. I've also checked the ones that
need 0.1 and changed those respectively.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]