[debbugs-tracker] bug#13465: closed (24.3.50; mml attached gpg signature filename convention)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2013 03:17:37 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#13465: 24.3.50; mml attached gpg signature filename 
convention
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #13465,
regarding 24.3.50; mml attached gpg signature filename convention
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
13465: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13465
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.3.50; mml attached gpg signature filename convention
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:27:16 +0100
>
>
>
>
> Minor bug / cosmetics.
>
> I've been exchanging signed emails using Emacs recently and noticed that
> unlike others (non-emacsers), the filename of my attached signature is
> always "noname" instead of "signature.asc".
>
> Help from #emacs on freenode leads me to line 719 in rmailmm.el where I
> find the "noname" hardcoded. Shouldn't this read "signature.asc"
> instead (which seems conventional)?
>
> kind regards,
>
> Milan Santosi
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#13465: 24.3.50; mml attached gpg signature filename convention
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 06 May 2013 03:17:37 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
>
>
>
>
> Version: 24.4
>
> Glenn Morris wrote:
>
> > mml-secure-sign to use:
> >
> >   Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
>
> Done.
>
>
> --- End Message ---