emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#8784: closed (Support developer-reserved AM_DIST


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#8784: closed (Support developer-reserved AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS)
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:35:02 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:33:39 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [PATCH] {maint} distcheck: add support for 
AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS (was: Re: bug#8784: Support developer-reserved 
AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS)
has caused the GNU bug report #8784,
regarding Support developer-reserved AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
8784: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8784
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Support developer-reserved AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:08:20 +0200 User-agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; )
Severity: wishlist

Hello automakers.

Continuing with the good trend of avoiding to impinge on the user
namespace, we should start supporting AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS
in addition to DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS, so that the former can be
reserved for the developer to be set in the 'Makefile.am's, and the
latter left for the user, packager or tester to use freely.

Sorry for the curtness of this message, but it is thought more as
a "note to self" than a bug report proper.

Regards,
  Stefano



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [PATCH] {maint} distcheck: add support for AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS (was: Re: bug#8784: Support developer-reserved AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:33:39 +0200 User-agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; )
On Friday 10 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Reference:
>  <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8784>
> 
> On Thursday 02 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > Severity: wishlist
> > 
> > Hello automakers.
> > 
> > Continuing with the good trend of avoiding to impinge on the user
> > namespace, we should start supporting AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS
> > in addition to DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS, so that the former can be
> > reserved for the developer to be set in the 'Makefile.am's, and the
> > latter left for the user, packager or tester to use freely.
> > 
> > Sorry for the curtness of this message, but it is thought more as
> > a "note to self" than a bug report proper.
> > 
> > Regards,
> >   Stefano
> > 
> > 
> Implemented in the first one of the attached patches.  The second patch
> is a follow-up updating the "maintainer-check" rules accordingly.
> 
> OK for maint?  This should be quite uncontroversial, so I'll push in 72
> hours if there is no review by then.
> 
> Regards,
>   Stefano
> 
I've pushed these patches to maint now.

Regards,
  Stefano


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]