|
From: | Emacs bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#5529: marked as done (`uniquify-buffer-name-style' doesn't exist) |
Date: | Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:24:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:23:01 -0500 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#5529: `uniquify-buffer-name-style' doesn't exist has caused the Emacs bug report #5529, regarding `uniquify-buffer-name-style' doesn't exist to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact address@hidden immediately.) -- 5529: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5529 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: `uniquify-buffer-name-style' doesn't exist Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:18:59 +0000 User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Hi, Emacs! On the Emacs manual page "Uniquify" ("Making Buffer Names Unique"), it says you can change the style of buffer names like foo.c<2> by customising the variable `uniquify-buffer-name-style'. This variable doesn't exist. It didn't exist in Emacs 22 or Emacs 21 either. My feeling is that it is the code rather than the manual which is at fault. :-) -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#5529: `uniquify-buffer-name-style' doesn't exist Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:23:01 -0500 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) I've mentioned in the manual that uniquify must be loaded explicitly. This obviously isn't ideal but there is already a separate bug to improve this specific issue; and the more general issue has also been discussed elsewhere.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |