[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emacs-bidi] UTR#9 - Unicode BiDi (was Re: OpenOffice BiDi kudos)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [emacs-bidi] UTR#9 - Unicode BiDi (was Re: OpenOffice BiDi kudos) |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:54:31 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 04:15:13 -0400
> From: Behdad Esfahbod <address@hidden>
>
> Is it true that your implementation of Unicode Bidi algorithm
> does not follow the UTR#9, with respect to handligh dash? Just
> wanted to make sure this is not true, otherwise, please consider
> following the standard.
Handa-san is currently trying to plug the sequential implementation of
UAX#9 that I wrote into the Emacs display code. The code I wrote
renders "H-5" as "-5H", as per UAX#9. One needs to type "H-{RLM}5"
to get the "H-5" result that most Hebrew users want.
I guess we will need to get used to type RLM and LRM in similar
situations, since we must be UAX#9 compliant, and since UAX#9 results
in such madness in quite a few cases like this, sigh.