[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Duplicity-tracker] [bug #21812] Feature request: differential backups
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[Duplicity-tracker] [bug #21812] Feature request: differential backups |
Date: |
Mon, 19 May 2008 09:42:31 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080418 Ubuntu/7.10 (gutsy) Firefox/2.0.0.14 |
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #21812 (project duplicity):
Something slightly less general than specifying an arbitrary base, but
simpler to use and possibly to implement would be a '--incremental-level X'
command that functions similarly to the traditional UNIX dump(8).
Level 0 is the same as a full backup, and levels > 0 are incremental backups
based on the previous backup with incremental level <= X. "All" that would
need to be done progmaticly is to ignore all files with a differential level >
X. This is slightly different than dump(8) which uses <= instead of <, but
more appropriate for a filesystem backed storage where media changes aren't an
issue.
Similarly, remove-older-than would have an incremental level option that only
removed backups >= X, allowing you to delete old daily backups but keep the
weeklies. remove-all-but-n-full could also have a version that specified the
level rather than only operating on full backups, but I would have to think
about how to handle dependencies then.
I think this is far more suitable for scripting than specifying the source
based on a target date or revision, especially without substantially improving
the collection-status output.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?21812>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Duplicity-tracker] [bug #21812] Feature request: differential backups,
anonymous <=