|
From: | Michael Terry |
Subject: | Re: [Duplicity-talk] [Duplicity-team] Python 2.6.0 testing |
Date: | Sun, 18 May 2014 08:24:02 -0400 |
Mike, still no luck, although the host error has vanished.
running ./testing/manual/backendtest, gives the 404, see below [1].
running manually works for first backup and collection-status but fails on second backup (incremental) with temp file missing [2]. i could reproduce it with python 2.6.0 and 2.7.6 .
..ede
[1]
======================================================================
ERROR: test_get (__main__.webdavsTest)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/srv/www/vhosts/host/dupl-trunk.webdav-0.7/testing/manual/../../testing/unit/test_backend_instance.py", line 53, in test_get
self.backend._get('a', getfile)
File "/srv/www/vhosts/host/dupl-trunk.webdav-0.7/testing/manual/../../duplicity/backends/webdavbackend.py", line 387, in _get
raise e
BackendException: Bad status code 404 reason Not Found.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 220 tests in 24.561s
FAILED (errors=1)
[2]
Backtrace of previous error: Traceback (innermost last):
File "/srv/www/vhosts/host/dupl-trunk.webdav-0.7/duplicity/backend.py", line 367, in inner_retry
return fn(self, *args)
File "/srv/www/vhosts/host/dupl-trunk.webdav-0.7/duplicity/backend.py", line 543, in get
"from backend") % util.ufn(local_path.name))
BackendException: File /tmp/duplicity-pbzbBZ-tempdir/mktemp-Ncg2Pw-2 not found locally after get from backend
Attempt 1 failed. BackendException: File /tmp/duplicity-pbzbBZ-tempdir/mktemp-Ncg2Pw-2 not found locally after get from backend
On 18.05.2014 03:50, Michael Terry wrote:
> Ed, now that the 2.6.0 compatibility stuff landed, does trunk work well for you with webdav?
> -mt
>
>
> On 13 May 2014 09:07, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> On 13.05.2014 14:56, Michael Terry wrote:
> > On 13 May 2014 08:19, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>> wrote:
> >
> > > Version of py26 in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS: 2.6.5
> > > Version of py26 in Debian oldstable: 2.6.6
> > > Version of py26 in RHEL6: 2.6.6
> > >
> > > I'm not pushing to drop support for py26 <2.6.5, just noting that it's getting hard for users to acquire those lower py26 versions.
> >
> > who would want to install old runtimes except devs in need to support older environments.
> >
> >
> > I just meant that users who have py26 <2.6.5 are "dying off" so to speak, as only users who installed a distro 4+ years ago and have not yet moved off of the now-EOL version have it. All new installs or users on supported distros have modern py26 versions.
> >
>
> yeah.. nothing lasts forever. that can be a good thing indeed! ..ede
>
>
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |