[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Google Drive vs. Google Cloud Storage
|
From: |
edgar . soldin |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Google Drive vs. Google Cloud Storage |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 May 2014 11:06:18 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
On 16.05.2014 04:23, Chris Vanden Berghe wrote:
> Just some feedback in case other people want to try Google Cloud
> Storage. I have been using Duplicity with GCS for 1,5 months now and so
> far so good. It's cheap at ~$4 / month for 200GB+ (inbound traffic is
> free, very little outbound traffic used). I has been perfectly stable.
> It's a bit on the slow side with a 200GB initial backup taking just over
> 24h to complete. I have sufficient bandwidth, so not entirely sure what
> the bottleneck is... CPU, throttling by Google or the Duplicity backend
> implementation. I have not tried Google Drive yet so cannot compare both
> services.
>
> Quick question: the first incremental backup after an initial full
> backup is always very large. What would be the reason for that? Is there
> an easy way to find out which files changed?
>
check your logs.. you might suffer from the same issue as
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/248111
..ede/duply.net