[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even
From: |
edgar . soldin |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:07:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
maybe i can beat you to it, but i am not very certain. in any way, please just
drop a short note if you find the time, i'll do the same.. ede
On 18.04.2013 01:54, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> I'm short on time as well. It should not read the remote unless the local
> one was not found. I'll look into it when I get the time.
>
> ...Ken
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:26 AM, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> wrote:
>
> yeah, please file a bug on launchpad, but check if there is a similar
> entry first please.
> also point to this mail thread (via gmane or some) for others to read.
>
> i still haven't and probably for some time will not have time to disect
> the issue.
> first and foremost. the local cache (archive-dir) functionality was
> introduced with 0.6 by Kenneth (the maintainer), so we should ask him what he
> thinks the issue is here. i tried before, but haven't got an anser. i'll cc
> him again.
>
> Ken: any idea on this? cite from below: "duplicity will sometimes decide
> to retrieve a manifest from the remote backup location even though there's a
> copy in the local cache"
>
>
> ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net>
>
>
> On 17.04.2013 04:04, address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> wrote:
> > So I guess I should just turn this into a bug report? Concerns me that
> I don't see a good way for the maintainer to reproduce the bug, which is
> going to make it hard to fix.
> >
> > One circumstance that was different when it failed from when it worked
> is this: I was running nightly backups, then the machines all got shut down
> for a week and a half, and it was when I started them back up that this
> failure appeared. Does duplicity like to retrieve the manifest from the
> remote if it's more than a week old?
> >
> > - Dave Cottingham
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!
> ---
> > *From: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> > *To: *"Discussion of the backup program duplicity" <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> > *Sent: *Friday, April 12, 2013 3:16:58 PM
> > *Subject: *Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup
> location even though it's in cache -- why?
> >
> > Here's the log file, gzipped. I should've thought of that myself.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dave Cottingham
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!
> ---
> > *From: *"edgar soldin" <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> > *To: *"Discussion of the backup program duplicity" <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> > *Sent: *Friday, April 12, 2013 2:05:00 PM
> > *Subject: *Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup
> location even though it's in cache -- why?
> >
> > did you try zipping it? else just put it on some filehoster/pastebin
> ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net>
> >
> > On 12.04.2013 19:03, address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> wrote:
> >> I see the same problem with 0.6.21.
> >>
> >> I found that one of my other machines was already running the latest
> version. It similarly fails when it decides to retrieve the latest manifest
> from the remote location, although the manifest is in the local cache.
> >>
> >> I tried sending this message this morning with the "-v9" log attached,
> and it never appeared on the list, so I'm trying again without the
> attachments. If this gets through I'll try sending the log in a subsequent
> message.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Dave Cottingham
> >>
> >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!
> ----
> >> *From: *"edgar soldin" <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> >> *To: *"Discussion of the backup program duplicity" <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> >> *Sent: *Monday, April 8, 2013 12:36:40 PM
> >> *Subject: *Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup
> location even though it's in cache -- why?
> >>
> >> looks like you are right. it explicitely states that the metadata is
> in sync, hence it should use the local copy.
> >>
> >> before anything else. please try the latest release 0.6.21. install it
> from tarball if your distro does not sport in the repository. directions here
> http://duply.net/?title=Duply-documentation under section TIP.
> >> we have had lot's of fixes since your version.
> >>
> >> @Ken: any idea why it still tries to download it?
> >>
> >> ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net>
> >>
> >> On 08.04.2013 17:29, address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> wrote:
> >>> Here's the output of "-v9" for one of my backups. It's quite
> voluminous, so I've put it in an attachment.
> >>>
> >>> I've also attached a list of the archive dir -- looks to me like the
> file it's trying to retrieve is already cached.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Dave Cottingham
> >>>
> >>>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!
> -----
> >>> *From: *"edgar soldin" <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> >>> *To: *"Discussion of the backup program duplicity" <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> >>> *Sent: *Monday, April 8, 2013 9:05:07 AM
> >>> *Subject: *Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup
> location even though it's in cache -- why?
> >>>
> >>> On 08.04.2013 02:58, address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>> I see that duplicity will sometimes decide to retrieve a manifest
> from the remote backup location even though there's a copy in the local
> cache. Can anyone clarify what circumstances cause this to happen, and why?
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's why I care. I am backing up to Amazon S3 and using a
> lifecycle rule to transition everything to Glacier. So, of course, nothing
> can be retrieved without prior manual intervention. I expected this to work
> since the local cache has everything duplicity needs, and in fact this worked
> with nightly backups for over two weeks. But now duplicity fails because it
> is trying to retrieve the last manifest, even though that file is in the
> cache.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> question is why. do you have an extra verbose '-v9' output for us?
> obfuscate private strings in it and post it here.
> >>>
> >>> ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net>
> >>>
>
>
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, edgar . soldin, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, dcottingham00, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, edgar . soldin, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, dcottingham00, 2013/04/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, T. Prost, 2013/04/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, edgar . soldin, 2013/04/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, dcottingham00, 2013/04/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, dcottingham00, 2013/04/16
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, edgar . soldin, 2013/04/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, Kenneth Loafman, 2013/04/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?,
edgar . soldin <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, dcottingham00, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, dcottingham00, 2013/04/12
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Sometimes reads manifest from backup location even though it's in cache -- why?, Kuang-che Wu, 2013/04/08