[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin
From: |
edgar . soldin |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2} |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:04:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 |
On 09.03.2012 13:43, han duply wrote:
>> 1. Are these "missing files" Really Backuped in the FTP Server ??
>>
>> Because the CMD "du -sh /usr/sbin /usr/sbin2" gives me:
>> /usr/sbin 34M
>> /usr/sbin2 32M <== So Where is the other files of 2M ?
>>
>
> can it be that subfolders of /usr/sbin are still excluded?
> you could ls -la each folder and diff the resulting outputs
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> -*No there is not, *see the content of "exclude" under my /etc/duply/tst2
> folder.
>
> 1 + /usr/bin
> 2 + /usr/sbin
> 3 - **
what did a line by line comparision result in?
> And finally I understand that all the "missing" file (e.g. "accton" ) is *a
> special file (symbolic link file, like a shortcut)* ,not the*"Source file"
> (which have the content of the file)*
>
yes, but a 'du' command should not follow symlinks unless you switch it on.
Meaning symlinks have a size of zero when fed to du.
e.g.
host:~> ls -la /bin/vim
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 10. Jan 2011 /bin/vim -> /etc/alternatives/vim
host:~> du /bin/vim
0 /bin/vim
Hence the symlinks wouldn't make up for the difference in size.
..ede/duply.net
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, edgar . soldin, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, han duply, 2012/03/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, edgar . soldin, 2012/03/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, han duply, 2012/03/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, edgar . soldin, 2012/03/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, han duply, 2012/03/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, edgar . soldin, 2012/03/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, han duply, 2012/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, edgar . soldin, 2012/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, han duply, 2012/03/09
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2},
edgar . soldin <=