[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?
From: |
edgar . soldin |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:35:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 |
On 29.02.2012 15:52, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:25 AM, SanskritFritz <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> 2012/2/29 Kenneth Loafman <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>:
> > Too bad there is not a client for Webdav like NcFTP that has gone to
> this
> > trouble already.
>
> Well, there are davfs [1] working and wdfs [2] not working whith
> box.net <http://box.net>, I just tested it.
>
> [1] http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/davfs2
> [2] http://noedler.de/projekte/wdfs/
>
>
> [1] may be the route to go. We could use the FTP backend as a model. I'm
> not inclined to fight issues related to non-standard implementations of the
> servers, thus NcFTP was chosen, so we'll need a volunteer to tackle this
> problem.
>
disagreed, these are fully fledged fuse based filesystems, which can easily be
set up today and used via file:// backend already.
the guy who found the solution for box.net claims that it chokes on
<D:allprop/> .. if that's the case we could easily set up a --webdav-options
switch that allows switching it off.
on the other hand, we currently don't need it anyway (maybe for the enhanced
upload plausability) but as far as i can see is <D:allprop/> not really
necessary as servers should at least return the list of files (urls) and more
properties at will, if no <D:allprop/> was defined.
shouldn't we try the route without <D:allprop/> first?
..ede
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, SanskritFritz, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, edgar . soldin, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, SanskritFritz, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, edgar . soldin, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, SanskritFritz, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, edgar . soldin, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, Kenneth Loafman, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, SanskritFritz, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, Kenneth Loafman, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, Michael Terry, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?,
edgar . soldin <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, Ken Bass, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, edgar . soldin, 2012/02/29