Re: [Duplicity-talk] Bugtracker on launchpad

[edgar . soldin]

On 30.01.2012 09:32, Jan Niggemann wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> last wednesday, I filed bug #921480 on launchpad. I somehow imagined, that it 
> would be classified sooner than thatn, as my bug still has status 'new'. Out 
> of curiosity, I went through the other bugs and noticed that there are 75 
> other bug all with status 'new', some of which are quite old. Take bug 
> #644820 for example, that one is about a simple typo in the manpage. The bug 
> is more than a year old (2010-09-22) and still in status 'new'. It could very 
> easily be fixed and closed, so I'm kind of wondering why it's still 'new'.
> 
> At the moment, there are 75 bugs with status 'new', only 10 of those have the 
> importance 'wishlist'.
> May I perhaps help triaging the bugs or something else related to the 
> bugtracker?
> 

triaging would make sense if you'd also intend to fix some or at least try to 
reproduce them, do you? 
the backlog simply shows that duplicity lacks developers, that's a fact and 
won't change just because the bugs are not tagged as new anymore.

let's wait what ken has to say.

..ede/duply.net