Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity and partial rsync transfers

[edgar . soldin]

On 31.08.2011 20:27, Eliot Moss wrote:
> On 8/31/2011 11:59 AM, address@hidden wrote:
>> On 31.08.2011 17:16, Eliot Moss wrote:
>>> On 8/31/2011 10:46 AM, address@hidden wrote:
>>>> On 31.08.2011 15:33, Eliot Moss wrote:
>>>>> On 8/31/2011 8:04 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> 
> I've gone through and added --rsync-options along the lines
> of --ssh-options.  I agree that doing it that way is more
> consistent, but it does touch modify more .py files and
> introduce more code than the env variable approach,
> including:
> 
> duplicity.1
> commandline.py
> globals.py
> rsyncbackend.py

yeah, but that's a design flaw in duplicity itself. ideally backends could 
register their commandline switches, like their protocols, but currently they 
simply can't.

thanks for going forward with it

> 
> That said, it's not a *big* edit. Once I've done some testing
> I'll see about sending a patch to the list ...
> 

take the time you need to test it thoroughly.. regards ede/duply.net