Re: [Duplicity-talk] What happened to "file:" protocol?

[Kenneth Loafman]

Scott Hannahs wrote:
> I was testing a setup of duplicity and eventually I will get it working
> with the dreamhost backup area.  But as has been recommended I was first
> backing up to a local file system directory.  But with an update to
> duplicity I get an "unsupported backend" for the file::// protocol? 
> What happened here?  I think it is still in the man page.
> 
> My test command is
> /sw/bin/duplicity full --encrypt-key XXXXXXXX --sign-key XXXXXXXX
> $HOME/Documents/ file:///tmp/Documents/
> and I get a response
> 
> "UnsupportedBackendScheme: scheme not supported in url:
> file:///tmp/Documents"/
> 
> When did file: become unsupported?  Or am I doing something incredibly
> foolish?

It's file: not file::.  That's the problem.

...Ken

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature