[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The company that wants to contribute (was Re: [Duplicity-talk] Vers
From: |
Michael Terry |
Subject: |
Re: The company that wants to contribute (was Re: [Duplicity-talk] Version 0.5.07 Released) |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:42:06 -0500 |
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Quim Gil <address@hidden> wrote:
> That is a useful assumption. Corporate lawyers were reluctant few years
> ago about GPL and free software licenses in general and here you have
> now a whole Maemo platform having LGPL 2.1 as default preferred license
> (and a whole Qt stack being relicensed to add LGPL as well).
You mentioned the non-existant 'GPL 2.1' earlier, and now you mention
LPGL 2.1 being Maemo's default license. We're all talking about
Duplicity moving to GPLv2+, not LGPLv2.1+, right?
-mt
- The company that wants to contribute (was Re: [Duplicity-talk] Version 0.5.07 Released), Quim Gil, 2009/02/04
- Re: The company that wants to contribute (was Re: [Duplicity-talk] Version 0.5.07 Released), Ian Barton, 2009/02/04
- Re: The company that wants to contribute (was Re: [Duplicity-talk] Version 0.5.07 Released), Michael Terry, 2009/02/04
- Re: The company that wants to contribute (was Re: [Duplicity-talk] Version 0.5.07 Released), edgar . soldin, 2009/02/05
- RE: The company that wants to contribute (was Re: [Duplicity-talk] Version 0.5.07 Released), quim.gil, 2009/02/05
- [Duplicity-talk] FOSDEM (was: Re: The company that wants to contribute), Axel Beckert, 2009/02/05