[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] remove-all-but-n-full needs --force?
From: |
Kenneth Loafman |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] remove-all-but-n-full needs --force? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:22:43 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081125) |
Jon wrote:
> Hi
>
> Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
>> Good morning,
>>
>> I just noticed that my full backups for the last 6 months aren't
>> getting deleted, because apparently the remove-all-but-n-full needs
>> the --force option.
>>
>> --force is usually reserved for "you WILL shoot yourself in the foot
>> if I allow you to do this" type of operations... is it really
>> necessary to have a "Are you sure [y/N]?" option for this operation?
>>
>
> I stumbled across the same thing a few months ago and had the same
> question. I agree that it seems odd to have to use a --force flag to
> delete old backup sets. Having to do so carries the implication that the
> user is doing something dangerous or wrong and that's generally not the
> case with routine stale archive removal.
This sounds like an idea worth exploring. At the moment, --force is
associated with any activity that would delete backup sets, including
the cleanup command.
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?group=duplicity is the place to submit
a bug report about this.
...Thanks,
...Ken
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature