[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes
From: |
Kenneth Loafman |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:33:27 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824) |
Stefan Hoth wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> since a few days I experience a strange behaviour of duplicity.
>
> While reviewing the logs a noticed that after a full backup
> (ftp-Backend) the list of exisiting backups shifts to one full backup
> (the last one) and several backup sets with "signature-less chains" (8
> till now).
>
> In the logs with highest verbosity I found this line:
>
> Running 'ncftpls -F -t 30 -u 'FTPUSER' -p '???' -X 'DELE
> duplicity-full-signatur
> es.2007-09-29T23:00:03+02:00.sigtar.gpg' 'ftp://FTPSERVER/backup
> /'' (attempt #1)
>
> I guess that this is the key to my signature-less chains... but why?
>
> Can (lol, I just wrote "Ken" - would be even good) anyone help me with
> this. By now I can restore the last backup but it seems that I lost my
> previous states.
>
> I used the current 0.4.4RC3 of duplicity in connection with the
> wrapper-script ftplicity (I guess it's known by now?!).
>
> Please help! :)
You only need sig files for doing incremental backups. Once you have a
full backup the sigs from previous backups are no longer needed since
you cannot do an incremental based on a previous full backup.
From what you said, duplicity is working as it should.
...Ken
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Stefan Hoth, 2007/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes,
Kenneth Loafman <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Stefan Hoth, 2007/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Stefan Hoth, 2007/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/10/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Stefan Hoth, 2007/10/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/10/06