duplicity-talk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Duplicity-talk] Concurrently running duplicities?


From: David Schneider-Joseph
Subject: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Concurrently running duplicities?
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:11:59 -0400

Alternatively, couldn't the full signatures be regenerated on the destination side, from the files themselves, and compared with the source? This would obviate the need for a full backup. Rather, it would just perform a "full verification".

On May 28, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Paul Walker wrote:

On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:13:43PM +0200, Andreas Schildbach wrote:

In this case, may I suggest a new feature: Automatically starting a full
backup after a defined time span. E.g. "--full-backup-every 1M" would
force a full backup when the last full backup is older than one month (or

I'd like to vote for this feature as well, please - it'd be very useful!

--
Paul

I've long believed that a large amount of our current technology was
invented by SF writers, and remained fiction until some geek read it and
thought "I know how to build that". -- Andrew Dalgleish




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]