[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pnet-developers] Use of ILNativeUInt vs. unsigned long in pointer c
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [Pnet-developers] Use of ILNativeUInt vs. unsigned long in pointer casting and manipulation |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:52:58 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Friday 24 September 2004 02:54 pm, Peter Colson wrote:
> If you have any tips for debugging cvm.c, let me know. I'm finding it
> difficult to debug into all the macros used in that module. I can see
> _ILCVMInterpreter being entered, lots of macro/include action and
> then failure in ReadLong (this is on the hello.exe sample).
The "pnet/engine/cvm_config.h" file contains some macros that can be used to
dump out various kinds of information as instructions are executed. Also see
"pnet/engine/HACKING", which is a little out of date, but still a good
starting point for how the engine is put together.
Cheers,
Rhys.
- [Pnet-developers] Use of ILNativeUInt vs. unsigned long in pointer casting and manipulation, Peter Colson, 2004/09/22
- Re: [Pnet-developers] Use of ILNativeUInt vs. unsigned long in pointer casting and manipulation, Gopal V, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Pnet-developers] Use of ILNativeUInt vs. unsigned long in pointer casting and manipulation, Miroslaw Dobrzanski-Neumann, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Pnet-developers] Use of ILNativeUInt vs. unsigned long in pointer casting and manipulation, Rhys Weatherley, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Pnet-developers] Use of ILNativeUInt vs. unsigned long in pointer casting and manipulation, Miroslaw Dobrzanski-Neumann, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Pnet-developers] Use of ILNativeUInt vs. unsigned long in pointer casting and manipulation, Rhys Weatherley, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Pnet-developers] Use of ILNativeUInt vs. unsigned long in pointer casting and manipulation, Rhys Weatherley, 2004/09/24