RE: [Pnet-developers] Re: Possible misinterpretation of 'protected internal'

[Gopal V]

Hi,

> Carl-Adam Brengesjo wrote:
> > check diff to the previous version and you'll
> notice power of the pnet design ;)

Heh, single line fix :)

> correspond to the `conventional oop terms'. 

More correctly I define that as "what Java does" ;-)
I learned OOP with Java (rather than C++, as most
people have done) , so what Java does makes sense 
for me . C# cannot afford to be too different in the 
semantics of visibility (other than the "internal"
methods stuff).

> BTW, has anyone heard about a (commonly accepted,
> even normative) glossary of `conventional oop
terms'?

JLS 2.0 is very nicely written .. though Java has
a few real rough edges with classes inside classes ..
I hope you read the logs :).

But hey, it's already fixed and checked in. Next !

Gopal


                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail