[Pnet-developers] [bugs #8778] pnetlib-0.6.4 configure script fails on Solaris 2.8

[Gopal.V]

This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
 of the project: DotGNU Portable.NET.

/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #8778] Latest Modifications:

Changes by: 
                Gopal.V <address@hidden>
'Date: 
                Mon 05/03/04 at 15:21 (Asia/Calcutta)

            What     | Removed                   | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Resolution | None                      | Fixed
              Status | Open                      | Closed


------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
Ok, fix checked in in CVS - 3rd May 2004 

Btw, it was more of a patch than a bug .. Thanks for the
bug and fix.






/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #8778] Full Item Snapshot:

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=8778>
Project: DotGNU Portable.NET
Submitted by: Sebastien BOCQ
On: Mon 05/03/04 at 15:13

Category:  None
Severity:  5 - Average
Item Group:  None
Resolution:  Fixed
Assigned to:  None
Status:  Closed


Summary:  pnetlib-0.6.4 configure script fails on Solaris 2.8

Original Submission:  I get the following error message with the configure 
script of pnetlib-0.6.4 on Solaris 2.8:

./configure: test: argument expected

After some investigation, I found out that the script is using 'test -e' 
statement which is not supported on Solaris. In the doc of autoconf 

(see http://www.mcc.ac.uk/gnu/Manuals/autoconf/html_chapter/autoconf_10.html)

it is advised to replace all 'test -e' statements by 'test -f' for portability 
which is what I did and now the script is working successfuly.

(first time I report a bug, hope it's OK like that).

Follow-up Comments
------------------


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon 05/03/04 at 15:21         By: t3rmin4t0r
Ok, fix checked in in CVS - 3rd May 2004 

Btw, it was more of a patch than a bug .. Thanks for the
bug and fix.












For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=8778>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/