Re: [Pnet-developers] Comparing Portable.NET and Microsoft.NET(part 1)

[Gopal V]

Just a minor comment ...

I think you missed a using A; there ..

Gopal
--- address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
> I had compared Portable.NET (framework)(version
0.6.4) and Microsoft.NET
> (framework) under windows (using cygwin) and found
several
> incompatibilities.
> 
> Part1 compiler incompatibilities.
> cscc is great compiler but has some bugs:
> //lib.cs
> using System;
> namespace A
> {
> public class PluginLoader {
>  public static void Main_dll()
>     {
>   Console.WriteLine("hi");}
>     }
> }
> //compiling : cscc -out lib.dll lib.cs
> //ok
> 
> //app.cs
> using System;
> //namespace A //if comment deleted it will work
> //{
> class Test { static void Main(string[] args)
>   {    A.PluginLoader.Main_dll();}
>     }
> //}
> // compiling : cscc -l lib.dll app.cs
> error:
> app.cs:6: `A' is not declared in the current scope
> app.cs:6: `A' is not declared in the current scope
> app.cs:6: invalid left operand to `.'
> app.cs:6: called object is not a method or delegate
> 
> //compiling using Microsoft: csc -r:lib.dll app.cs
> //ok
> possible several next bugs is from cygwin:
> 1) i can't compile to jvm code
> PNET\samples\simple>cscc -mjvm hello.cs
>       3 [main] cscc 496 handle_exceptions:
Exception:
> STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION
>     545 [main] cscc 496 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping
stack trace to
> cscc.exe.stackdump
> Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=00445B13
> eax=00000000 ebx=00000009 ecx=00000000 edx=00000000
esi=101ED2F8
> edi=101EE298
> ebp=0022EB18 esp=0022EAD0
program=D:\Programs\PNET\bin\cscc.exe
> cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0038 gs=0000 ss=0023
> Stack trace:
> Frame     Function  Args
> 0022EB18  00445B13  (101ED2F8, 00000002, 00000002,
00000002)
> 0022EB48  004466AC  (101ED2F8, 06000001, 0022EBC0,
610908A0)
> 0022EC18  0045C454  (101EE298, 00000000, 0022EC98,
0043767F)
> 0022EC28  004498DF  (101EE298, 00000000, 00004000,
00000096)
> 0022EC98  0043767F  (100333F8, 101EE298, 10025D80,
00000000)
> 0022ED08  0043AC69  (100333F8, 101EE1F8, 00000000,
00000000)
> 0022ED28  0043AE2A  (100333F8, 101ED2F8, 101EDF48,
101ED2F8)
> 0022ED68  004340ED  (100333F8, 101ED2F8, 101F4850,
000001B6)
> 0022EDB8  00434395  (100333F8, 10021CB0, 10021E9C,
00000000)
> 0022EE98  00432CE6  (00000001, 10021DD8, 00000000,
00000000)
> 0022EED8  0040376D  (10021CC8, 00000001, 00401062,
00000001)
> 0022EF10  004012F0  (00000003, 100201C8, 100200A8,
00000001)
> 0022EF80  61005DE0  (0022EF98, FFFFFFFF, 00000000,
00245728)
> 0022FF90  61005EE5  (00000000, 00000000, 00000000,
00000000)
> End of stack trace
> 
> 2)when cscc create exe file on ntfs file system it
sets permission ONLY READ
> AND WRITE
> and NO execute permission.
> so if you try to start exe you'll see "Access
Denied."
> 
> Can you make wrapper csc tool with same keys as
microsoft csc and only for
> compiling cs files (as microsoft csc)?
> when build string will be same and comparing of
compilers will be more
> easily
> 
> 
> part 2 (in next letter ) about incopatibilities in
class system (Emit
> namespace).
> 
=== Message Truncated === 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/