[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pnet-developers] pnetlib binary pkgs: --with-profile=ecma?
From: |
Stephen Compall |
Subject: |
[Pnet-developers] pnetlib binary pkgs: --with-profile=ecma? |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:51:59 -0600 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
ajmitch asks: OK, so what should debian packages be built as? With or
without MS extensions, or as 2 separate builds? (easy to do in the
build scripts)
S11 replies: I feel that building --with-profile=ecma only at this stage
would be best for the project. I'm sure some would disagree with me,
but I think they're wrong. (We need people who say the platform is
useless w/o the MS extensions like we need people flooding the list
with "Will DotGNU have VB.NET support?" requests.) I am planning to do
the next Mandrake RPMs like this, and put them in Cooker contribs if
I'm lucky :) -S11
- --
Stephen Compall - Also known as S11001001
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://dotgnu.org
Jabber ID: address@hidden
and my only way out is to go so far in
-- Tori Amos, "Spring Haze"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+fhBj2AceYinZ4EgRAprLAJwPpLG+n9Hbf2eLjXQbYCQbcjUSMQCfcD9A
XYnbDYrhtP2Wss8r3LVJ9U0=
=TWYt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Pnet-developers] pnetlib binary pkgs: --with-profile=ecma?,
Stephen Compall <=