[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]ECMA Standard Base classes and Assemblies.
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]ECMA Standard Base classes and Assemblies. |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Oct 2003 08:12:32 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Saturday 11 October 2003 03:46 am, jscottb wrote:
> Can we assume the all the Assemblies and Classes listed on the DotGNU docs
> site (http://www.dotgnu.org/pnetlib-doc/) to be Standard ones only?
Yes. That site lists only the ECMA classes, which (theoretically) will be
exempted by any patent that MS may or may not get in the future.
Cheers,
Rhys.
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the US-patent-endangered APIs?, (continued)
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the US-patent-endangered APIs?, Ian MacLean, 2003/10/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to theUS-patent-endangered APIs?, Seth Johnson, 2003/10/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the US-patent-endangered APIs?, Gopal V, 2003/10/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to theUS-patent-endangered APIs?, Seth Johnson, 2003/10/11
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the US-patent-endangered APIs?, Paolo Molaro, 2003/10/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the US-patent-endangered APIs?, Norbert Bollow, 2003/10/13
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the US-patent-endangered APIs?, Adam Ballai, 2003/10/13
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to theUS-patent-endangered APIs?, Seth Johnson, 2003/10/11
- RE: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the US-patent-endangered APIs?, jscottb, 2003/10/12
[DotGNU]ECMA Standard Base classes and Assemblies., jscottb, 2003/10/10
- Re: [DotGNU]ECMA Standard Base classes and Assemblies.,
Rhys Weatherley <=