[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]call to arms (a real reply)
From: |
Gopal V |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]call to arms (a real reply) |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jul 2002 18:19:25 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Peter Minten wrote:
> > my primary motivation for this is so that people (like me) who want to
> > recruit people to work on dotGNU will know what
I think this is essential ,we've been bad at keeping new developers to
DotGNU ... I had been the unofficial guy who was to keep in touch with
the new guys .. But I am currently *very* busy for long periods of time
and we've had issues with developer turnover (Bad ! ,very Bad)
> > while we should encourage all people to join, i think we would get a
> > good return on the small effort it would take to put up such as list.
I think you mean a kind of [TODO] list ? (or just skill levels and general
info about the fast moving stuff ?)
> > it can also give people a good place to start if they just happen to
> > be wondering by.
.............
> DotGNU-Base can always use some new developers. Only basic skills in C# are
> needed and an idea what new classes DotGNU-Base could use.
Ok when he said basic, he meant basic :-) ... I have a fine example of a
bug which should have been caught a looong time ago ... But I guess nobody
is trying to compile stuff with pnet ... I suppose trying to work out the
bugs is the most ideal place to start working on C# .
The attached program was written for pnetbook and proved to be the most
surprising bug (or mistake on my part) I ever saw .... (compiler issue ?)
Also attached is a Todo that is a bit bloated.
Gopal
PS: I will have to apologize to BioChem333 for accusing his Base64
stuff to be buggy , but well it's a bug afterall
--
The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success
todo
Description: Text document
test.cs
Description: Text document