[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Reply: Question about DotGNU-Base
From: |
Gopal V |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Reply: Question about DotGNU-Base |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 19:07:36 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Stijn Adhemar Vandamme wrote:
> So the answer is probably: stuff == classes.
Well extending the "language" is really tough as we have to implement
compiler features as well :-) ... Maybe rhys will add a few of his
tricks to the C# bag when cscc supports the whole ECMA 334 spec ...
> Will you document the DotGNU-Base embrace-and-extend APIs in such a way
> that other CLI implementations (Mono comes to mind) have enough
> information to implement them independantly, too, if they want to?
Documenting is absolutely necessary , I'm sure we'll be able to put
in csdoc comments to document it correctly ....
mono implement them independently ? .... why ?
Gopal
--
The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success