[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User
From: |
Norbert Bollow |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces) |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 17:34:08 +0200 |
Timothy Rue <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 11-Jul-02 08:54:55 David Bradley <address@hidden> wrote:
> DB> BioChem333 wrote:
>
> DB> I'm not against adding extensions, but it appears to be a concern
> DB> of many. I think people can make informed decisions on whether
> DB> to use them or not. We've been doing it for ages in C and C++.
>
> DB> David Bradley
>
> Make it a non issue by making it possble for more people to more easily
> make up their own custom (perhaps industry and field specific) extensions.
Timothy,
How do you propose to prevent this from degenerating into an
interoperability + porting nightmare?
Greetings, Norbert.
--
Founder & Steering Committee member of http://www.gnu.org/projects/dotgnu/
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland)
Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://norbert.ch
List hosting with GNU Mailman on your own domain name http://cisto.com
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces), (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces), S11001001, 2002/07/10
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces), David Bradley, 2002/07/10
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/10
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), BioChem333, 2002/07/10
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers?(wasRe:User Interfaces), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces), BioChem333, 2002/07/10
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces), David Bradley, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces), BioChem333, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/12
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces),
Norbert Bollow <=
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/16
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/17
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces), David Bradley, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), David Bradley, 2002/07/09
- [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Boris Kolar, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Timothy Rue, 2002/07/09