[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business
From: |
D.I.Freeman |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 04:21:30 +0100 (BST) |
On 9 Jul 2002, Timothy Rue wrote:
> Considering the MS has deeper pockets than you and my pockets are turned
> inside out, mostly due to the computer industry, I'm going to have to
> either consider there are somethngs you cannot patent, like natural law,
> physical phenomenon and abstract ideas. Which I think would include the
> identification of the natural laws of our physical phenomenon to convert
> abstract ideas into reality... Mathmatical algorythims are another thing
> you are not suppose to be able to patent but considering some kid, with
> the help of his father who work in dealing with patents and trying to
> teach his kid a lesson in patents, got a patent on swinging sideways on
> a swing....I'd imagine you could get a friggn patent on air an try make
> everyone pay you for using it...
>
> But all this is really a fear tactic of use by those not really
> supporting freedom but rather one body rule methodologies. So instead,
> lets' focus on using the freedoms we have to improve and expand them,
> instead of extending monopolistic (who's got the most money) fear tactics.
>
> OK?
<tangent> Look in the Australian Patents, they have one for a Circular device
for the facilitation of movement. Or The Wheel in simple speak. Draw your own
conclusions!</tangent>
Sorry
D
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces), David Bradley, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), David Bradley, 2002/07/09
- [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Boris Kolar, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Timothy Rue, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business,
D.I.Freeman <=
- [DotGNU]freedom and the "quality of [GNU/]Linux" (was Re: DotGNU and business), S11001001, 2002/07/10
- [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Peter Minten, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Timothy Rue, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15