|
From: | David Bradley |
Subject: | Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU vs .NET (was Re: flexible for users, or...) User Interfaces) |
Date: | Tue, 09 Jul 2002 17:02:26 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020512 Netscape/7.0b1 |
Norbert Bollow wrote:
DotGNU is _not_ about cloning .NET ... we're planning quite a few things that have no counterpart in .NET ... and if you look at phpGroupWare you'll see that some (relatively small) parts of that kind are already available and useable.
That sounds interesting, I'll take a look.
Look forward to seeing more of this. For my limitted exposure to open source, it's been more of the other way. The open/free source varient was more difficult to use and not as good a quality, especially in support tools.(a) Make something similar to the good parts of what they create, while improving on it as we go along. (b) Make good things that don't exist in proprietary software yet.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |