[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]RE:Defining Webservices
From: |
David Nicol |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]RE:Defining Webservices |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:33:11 -0600 |
Bill Lance wrote:
>
> --- David Nicol <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> >
> > I would think transmitting an object is a subset of
> > method access.
> >
> > in other words, transmission is reducible to method
> > access.
> >
> > to transmit an object, you access (one of) its data
> > marshalling method(s)
> >
>
> Calling an objects method produces a package of data
> (or a side efect, or both). 'Transmitting an object'
> seems to me to imply a copying of the total object
> implimentation. And this implies copying and
> reexecuting the code, itself, producing a new base of
> the original object. Creating a new instance of a
> romote object thu an inheritance mechanism is a third
> means unique to networked OOP.
Whatever it is, it could be defined in terms of method access,
so I take Bill Lance's comment as in support of mine.
Also, we've gotten quite off the topic of "defining webservices"