discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Worrying news? "Apple’s Objective-C ‘appears to be reaching its end


From: Gregory Casamento
Subject: Re: Worrying news? "Apple’s Objective-C ‘appears to be reaching its end of life’ – or so says JetBrains survey "
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 17:12:36 -0500

Liam,

I saw this.  The tiobe index seems to disagree.  It’s also important to remember that jetbrains recently had to take down their AppCode application (which sucked) since it didn’t sell.

Jetbrains is the creator of the kotlin language so they have a vested interest in their android customers.  I would take their “index” with a grain of salt to say the least.  

While it is certain that Apple won’t be investing into thing beyond ObjC 2.0, it is foolhardy to think that ObjC is going away anytime soon since there is an enormous installed base of stable code, not the least of which is Foundation and AppKit themselves.   Also consider CocoaPods. 

So, no, not worried about it.  Also… look at Java and COBOL.  For years people have declared the end of both languages.  Java is still popular, though not in vogue and COBOL while not one of the “cool kids” has literally billions of lines of code being maintained and new code being written every year.  This (admittedly biased as it is by the CTO of MicroFocus) article gives some reasons why….

https://techbeacon.com/app-dev-testing/why-your-cobol-code-isnt-going-anywhere?amp

Plus… Apple already has a mechanism for automatically allowing objc and swift to work together.  Take a look at the frameworks in Xcode and you’ll notice some files called *.apinotes.  These are YAML files that are used by the compiler to allow easy integration into swift projects.  So, essentially, if Apple writes an ObjC version of a framework they get the swift version for absolutely free (minus the cost of writing the YAML file).  If they write a swift only version they don’t get that benefit. 

So, yeah, in conclusion…  Yes, ObjC is NOT on the rise, but reports of its demise have been greatly exaggerated!  ;)

Yours, GC
PS. That being said, Apple dumping ObjC might spell a boom for us as all of the people who have installed codebases would suddenly need support for it either on macOS (on which we don’t currently work) or on other platforms.  Something to think about…

PPS. All of the above being said.  I admit I wouldn’t be terribly shocked to hear from Apple that “we have dropped support for the legacy objc language to provide you with the best support for our new swift language to make it the ‘greatest developer experience in the world’” or some grotesque BS like that. Lol

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 06:05 Liam Proven <lproven@gmail.com> wrote:
https://devclass.com/2023/11/21/apples-objective-c-appears-to-be-reaching-its-end-of-life-or-so-says-jetbrains-survey/

Disclaimer: this is by a colleague of mine but I have seen other such
stories from the same survey.

--
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven@cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lproven@gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
IoM: (+44) 7624 277612: UK: (+44) 7939-087884
Czech [+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal]: (+420) 702-829-053


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]