[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lift "runs on GNU/Linux" requirement
From: |
David Hedlund |
Subject: |
Re: Lift "runs on GNU/Linux" requirement |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Aug 2021 11:39:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/78.11.0 |
I removed Notepad++ from https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Collection:Windows
Notepad++ and more can be found at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Single-platform_free_software
that I added to
https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory_talk:Free_software_replacements#Single-platform_free_software
On 2021-08-02 23:24, Adonay Felipe Nogueira via wrote:
> Em 23-07-2021 23:34, David Hedlund escreveu:
>> Added: "We list external links to free software without GNU/Linux
>> support for other operating systems
>> <https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:Free_software_replacements>
>> if they are particularly useful." to
>> https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Category/Runs-on/GNU/Linux
> I don't think we should let external links to possible free/libre
> software appear in public-facing pages unless we make create proper
> entries for those software.
>
> The Directory is a place where anyone can add software entries for
> review, then some evaluators/reviewers do one or two review checks (with
> varying depth of detail) and approve it or not in a way similar to
> saying that is, at that time and to that specific version, considered
> free/libre. If we simply link to a possibly free/libre software without
> actually reviewing it, we run the risk of, for example, end up linking
> to a software for Windows that depends on Microsoft Visual C++
> Redistributable.
>
> Also, I don't know if you recall this David Hedlund, but when we created
> the Collection namespace, both of us agreed that it would be used as a
> means of listing already-reviewed and curated/selected free/libre
> software that do some task to replace non-free ones.
>
>
- Re: Lift "runs on GNU/Linux" requirement, (continued)
- Re: Lift "runs on GNU/Linux" requirement, Lorenzo L. Ancora, 2021/08/03
- Re: Lift "runs on GNU/Linux" requirement, Michael McMahon, 2021/08/03
- Re: Lift "runs on GNU/Linux" requirement, Lorenzo L. Ancora, 2021/08/03
- Re: Lift "runs on GNU/Linux" requirement, David Hedlund, 2021/08/03
- New antifeature: Political messaging, David Hedlund, 2021/08/04
- Re: New antifeature: Political messaging, Yuchen Pei, 2021/08/04
- Re: New antifeature: Political messaging, Michael McMahon, 2021/08/04
- Re: New antifeature: Political messaging, Greg Farough, 2021/08/04
- Re: New antifeature: Political messaging, David Hedlund, 2021/08/04
- Re: New antifeature: Political messaging, David Hedlund, 2021/08/04
Re: Lift "runs on GNU/Linux" requirement,
David Hedlund <=
- Re: Lift "runs on GNU/Linux" requirement, Michael McMahon, 2021/08/04
- On the good neutrality of free software, Lorenzo L. Ancora, 2021/08/05
- Re: On the good neutrality of free software, Michael McMahon, 2021/08/06
- Re: On the good neutrality of free software, Greg Farough, 2021/08/06
- Re: On the good neutrality of free software, Ade Malsasa Akbar, 2021/08/07
- Re: On the good neutrality of free software, Lorenzo L. Ancora, 2021/08/08
- Re: On the good neutrality of free software, David Hedlund, 2021/08/09
- Re: On the good neutrality of free software, Lorenzo L. Ancora, 2021/08/25
- Re: On the good neutrality of free software, quiliro, 2021/08/25
- Re: On the good neutrality of free software, David Hedlund, 2021/08/26