[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [directory-discuss] FSF opinion on chromium, QtWebEngine, electron
From: |
Adonay Felipe Nogueira |
Subject: |
Re: [directory-discuss] FSF opinion on chromium, QtWebEngine, electron |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Nov 2017 15:02:20 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
To better track the work on the result of `licensecheck' and the
Chromium issues, I created a talk page ([1]).
And the current version of the result from `licensecheck' can be
download from torrent through DHT (no trackers) by using its hash ([2]).
[1] <https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Talk:Chromium>.
[2] 916fd8a45158ff660811a06beb6c3ec258a3b50e.
2017-11-03T12:31:12-0400 bill-auger wrote:
> i would like to ask about the FSF opinion of chromium and electron-based
> programs - as you probably know there was a big controversy this year
> over the chromium code-base and that caused parabola to remove and
> blacklist chromium and all QtWebEngine and electron-based programs - no
> one has heard any news of a change of opinion about this or any
> investigation so that is how it remains today because parabola wants to
> align with the FSF's opinion
>
> recently though users have been noting that there are a number of such
> programs listed in the directory[1][2] and the FSF has recently
> published an interview promoting the QtWebEngine-based qupzilla
> browser[3] so there are some mixed signals floating about and parabola
> has no clear answers to tell the users who want these programs restored
>
> has there been any change in the FSF opinion of chromium? if no, should
> those programs be removed from the directory? or if yes, could parabola
> restore them to their repos?
>
> [1]: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Visual_Studio_Code
> [2]: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Atom
> [3]:
> https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/the-licensing-and-compliance-lab-interviews-david-rosca-of-qupzilla
>
--
- https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno
- Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com
gratis).
- "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre. Por favor, veja formas de se comunicar
instantaneamente comigo no endereço abaixo.
- Contato: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno#vCard
- Arquivos comuns aceitos (apenas sem DRM): Corel Draw, Microsoft
Office, MP3, MP4, WMA, WMV.
- Arquivos comuns aceitos e enviados: CSV, GNU Dia, GNU Emacs Org, GNU
GIMP, Inkscape SVG, JPG, LibreOffice (padrão ODF), OGG, OPUS, PDF
(apenas sem DRM), PNG, TXT, WEBM.
- [directory-discuss] FSF opinion on chromium, QtWebEngine, electron, bill-auger, 2017/11/03
- Re: [directory-discuss] FSF opinion on chromium, QtWebEngine, electron, David Hedlund, 2017/11/04
- Re: [directory-discuss] FSF opinion on chromium, QtWebEngine, electron, bill-auger, 2017/11/04
- Re: [directory-discuss] FSF opinion on chromium, QtWebEngine, electron, David Hedlund, 2017/11/05
- Re: [directory-discuss] FSF opinion on chromium, QtWebEngine, electron, bill-auger, 2017/11/05
- Re: [directory-discuss] FSF opinion on chromium, QtWebEngine, electron, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2017/11/14
Re: [directory-discuss] FSF opinion on chromium, QtWebEngine, electron, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2017/11/14
Re: [directory-discuss] FSF opinion on chromium, QtWebEngine, electron,
Adonay Felipe Nogueira <=