[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [directory-discuss] Evaluating different components of Bitwarden
From: |
Adonay Felipe Nogueira |
Subject: |
Re: [directory-discuss] Evaluating different components of Bitwarden |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2017 22:44:15 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
I wonder what do you mean by "found wanting"?
David Seaward <address@hidden> writes:
> Thanks for the info. I've since got confirmation from the
> developer [1] that bitwarden/core depends on:
>
> * .NET core -- which seems to be free/libre (Expat/MIT with no "patent
> promise" file), https://github.com/dotnet/core
>
> * Microsoft SQL Server -- which is not free/libre
>
> So overall, not free unless someone writes support for a
> different database (at least).
>
> Does FSD have a mechanism for recording packages that have been
> evaluated and found wanting?
>
> [1] https://github.com/bitwarden/core/issues/86
>
> Regards,
> David
>
--
- https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno
- Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com
gratis).
- "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre. Por favor, veja formas de se comunicar
instantaneamente comigo no endereço abaixo.
- Contato: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno#vCard
- Arquivos comuns aceitos (apenas sem DRM): Corel Draw, Microsoft
Office, MP3, MP4, WMA, WMV.
- Arquivos comuns aceitos e enviados: CSV, GNU Dia, GNU Emacs Org, GNU
GIMP, Inkscape SVG, JPG, LibreOffice (padrão ODF), OGG, OPUS, PDF
(apenas sem DRM), PNG, TXT, WEBM.