Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 2.0

[Richard Shann]

Jeremiah,

once the mac problems are sorted can you remake the mingw builds as
there are a lot of updates now and I have a group of about a dozen
people who want to test!

Richard


On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 20:22 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> OK, this should be fixed too, and as this was only reported at the link
> stage it should be the last one...
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 13:17 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > I am still unable to compile the darwin version. Please see the
> > denemo.log file.
> > 
> > Jeremiah
> > 
> > On Sep 10, 2015 10:05 AM, "Richard Shann" <address@hidden>
> > wrote:
> >         I've been a little quiet about the 2.0 release schedule. It is
> >         for
> >         purely personal reasons - I needed to get to grips with
> >         beaming in
> >         LilyPond, and so I have put the results of this work into the
> >         release.
> >         You can now set up the beaming rule you want by doing an
> >         example by hand
> >         selecting it, and invoking a command.
> >          And just when I thought this was done, I realised that the
> >         case I had
> >         needed manual beaming, so I needed to find all the places
> >         where it was
> >         needed. So I've coded up a Search & Replace command, something
> >         long in
> >         the back of my mind, but needing a real life use-case.
> >         How it works is that you make a selection and invoke
> >         Navigation->Seek->Search Rhythmic Pattern (or Ctrl-f, Ctrl-f)
> >         and this
> >         searches for the same sequence of note-durations on the staff.
> >         When
> >         found you can stop to edit, or if you have the edit commands
> >         recorded in
> >         the Scheme window you can execute them and continue.
> >         
> >         Now, I *really* think it is time we moved to a release!
> >         
> >         Is a set of binaries possible now?
> >         
> >         Richard
> >         
> >         
> >         On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 19:10 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> >         > I've tested
> >         >
> >         >
> >         http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/gub/uploads/denemo-mingw-0.0.0.zip
> >         >
> >         > which is a getting close to the final 2.0 version. Can other
> >         windows
> >         > users please test.
> >         >
> >         > Richard
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 13:13 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> >         > > I have built a new mingw binary.
> >         > >
> >         > > Jeremiah
> >         > >
> >         > > On Aug 26, 2015 4:00 AM, "Richard Shann"
> >         <address@hidden>
> >         > > wrote:
> >         > >         I've now added Score, Movement, Staff and Voice
> >         property
> >         > >         editors to the
> >         > >         Object editor, so that there is a consistent
> >         interface to
> >         > >         editing things
> >         > >         that have been added to a score. The Staff
> >         Property Editor
> >         > >         gives access
> >         > >         to directives added to time and keysignatures so
> >         that all
> >         > >         Denemo
> >         > >         Directives now have a user-friendly interface for
> >         editing them
> >         > >         (provided
> >         > >         the command creating them self-edits).
> >         > >
> >         > >         I've updated the manual to reflect these additions
> >         - I think
> >         > >         they
> >         > >         constitute quite a change to Denemo use beyond the
> >         stage of
> >         > >         entering
> >         > >         music - previously when a property was added to,
> >         say, a key
> >         > >         signature it
> >         > >         was not easy to find out which command had been
> >         invoked. Now
> >         > >         you can get
> >         > >         up the editor and find out and, reverse or modify
> >         the effect
> >         > >         if desired.
> >         > >         There are still commands that do not self-edit but
> >         once I have
> >         > >         been
> >         > >         through fixing those I think the result will merit
> >         a change in
> >         > >         the major
> >         > >         version number - I propose this next version be
> >         version 2.0
> >         > >
> >         > >         Any feedback on the new properties editors would
> >         be most
> >         > >         welcome (a new
> >         > >         mingw binary would be helpful too for those poor
> >         souls still
> >         > >         sticking
> >         > >         with windows).
> >         > >
> >         > >         Richard
> >         > >
> >         > >
> >         > >
> >         > >         _______________________________________________
> >         > >         Denemo-devel mailing list
> >         > >         address@hidden
> >         > >
> >          https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > _______________________________________________
> >         > Denemo-devel mailing list
> >         > address@hidden
> >         > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >         
> >         
> >         
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Denemo-devel mailing list
> >         address@hidden
> >         https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel