Re: [Denemo-devel] createbutton isn't showing the formated content

[Richard Shann]

On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 12:02 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I fixed the crash and the widgets are packed.
I'm not sure which stage you are at, but after git pull right now I see
these
      * The Score->Score Properties is crashing
      * The Scheme window does not pack properly (you can only get half
        the text area, the rest is assigned to the CLI and Execute
        buttons).
I haven't been able to check the Audio Input boxes because my
installation won't open the portaudio default, I am not trying to fix
this as the GSOC work is not complete.

Richard


>  I can revert the gtk_containers back to gtk_box_pack if you like. I will 
> probably not have time until monday to do this reversion though. It tested it 
> and it looks fine to me. It can look better but I think I can polish it with 
> some of the other gtk_container functions. The gtk_container_add just uses 
> gtk packing defaults. Any dialog has a space called the content area where 
> widgets can be packed. I am just placing a vbox in the content area and then 
> packing all the other widgets into the vbox.
> 
> Jeremiah
> 
> Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T
> 
> Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 13:24 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> >> I will take of the crash tonight.
> >I see you have made one commit. Are you fixing all the issues from the
> >merge? Score Properties dialog and GtkBox->GtkContainer issues...?
> >Richard
> >
> >>  
> >> 
> >> Jeremiah
> >> 
> >> Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T
> >> 
> >> Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 10:57 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> >> >> I switched because dialogs no longer have an accessable ->vbox member 
> >> >> anymore. I also thought gtk_container looked cleaner then gtk_box_pack. 
> >> >OK, that was a mistake. Containers are a much more primitive thing, they
> >> >don't allow you to control the way the sub-widgets are arranged and how
> >> >much of the available space they take. In fact, IIRC, you can (or could
> >> >in gtk2) only have one widget inside a container.
> >> >Can you look again at how you do the placement of GtkVBox and HBoxes now
> >> >in gtk3 - some sort of accessor function for the ->vbox member I would
> >> >imagine?
> >> >
> >> >Also, there is an immediate crash on trying Score->Score Properties.
> >> >Smells of memory corruption again :(
> >> >
> >> >The Educational->CreateButton problem is not due to the migration, it is
> >> >a bug I introduced trying to fix the problem of displaying titles (like
> >> >Pavana & Galliarda Dolorosa) that include characters that mean something
> >> >as markup (sorry). I am not sure how to handle this for best - it may be
> >> >we will need to set a flag to indicate whether the display field
> >> >contains markup or not... I'll think this over.
> >> >
> >> >Richard
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Jeremiah
> >> >> 
> >> >> Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T
> >> >> 
> >> >> Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> >I see this bug. Another one (introduced by you packing of boxes changes
> >> >> >to container) is that the scheme script window does not expand properly
> >> >> >- the buttons expand as well. What forced you to change from vbox,hbox
> >> >> >to GtkContainer?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Richard
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 08:31 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> >> >> >> When testing educational-Note Reading-Line and space recognition, I 
> >> >> >> get 
> >> >> >> unformatted buttons. So the buttons looks something like:
> >> >> >> <b>help</b>
> >> >> >> instead of having a bold help.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> Jeremiah
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> Denemo-devel mailing list
> >> >> >> address@hidden
> >> >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >