Re: [Denemo-devel] Lyrics

[Richard Shann]

On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 12:17 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 08:20 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> > I propose to replace the measures field of the DenemoStaff with a
> > field
> > called bars. This would point to a GList of DenemoMeasure which would
> > have a field called measure containing a list of DenemoObject.
> > Then all the code referring to the staff->measures will need to refer
> > to
> > ((DenemoMeasure*)staff->bars->data)->measure->data and all the
> > creation
> > and destruction of the measures field will need to be re-written to
> > create/destroy a DenemoMeasure.
> 
> The lilypond parser presents a challenge:
Actually, the problem is worse than that: the assumption that the
measures are a list of lists is implicit almost everywhere in the code -
it would not be enough just to identify where the measures field is used
as pointers to it are passed around & the same assumption made in the
receiving functions.
So I will work around the problem,

Richard



>  I propose to create a field
> staff->lilymeasures to take over the role of the current staff->measures
> field for the lilypond input phase, moving the data into the staff->bars
> field before the parser returns.
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel