Re: ddd & bonobo - ps

[Arnaud Charlet]

> oh, I didn't know that. I sort of just assumed that ada would lag behind the
> development cycle. (I guess it shows my prejudices.)

No problem, mailing lists are also here for information.

> However, I still think that ddd should bonobize itself. Probably a stupid 
> question, but if bonobo components are so easy to write in ada, what makes
> bonobo components based on motif so difficult?

It is not really a matter of language, it is more a matter of
proper structuring of a software.

GVD has been written with modularity in mind from the start.

Arno