cp-tools-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] autotooling gjdoc


From: Andrew Overholt
Subject: Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] autotooling gjdoc
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:14:22 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

* Casey Marshall <address@hidden> [2004-09-28 20:27]:
> 
> Also, I never got around to using libtool to generate resource
> objects, which I think should be done (otherwise, libtool complains
> that linking against non-libtool files is not portable, but I don't
> know if this actually leads to problems).

I don't think it's a problem, but I've done it nonetheless.  AFAICT, things
work either way.  I've attached a patch to my previous Makefile.am for
using libtool to generate the resource objects.  I guess we can go with
this version and use libtool elsewhere in Makefile.am if we want.  I got
the LTGCJCOMPILE incarnation from H.J. Lu in gcc bugzilla #17290.

Andrew

Attachment: Makefile.am.libtool.patch
Description: Text document


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]