cp-tools-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] DebugDoclet >> XmlDoclet]


From: Julian Scheid
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] DebugDoclet >> XmlDoclet]
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 15:26:39 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204

JS wrote:

> Alex Lancaster wrote:
>
> > What about libxslt (xsltproc is the command processor) name from
> > Daniel Veillard (http://xmlsoft.org)?
>
> Sounds good, I'll give it a try.

Hell! This thing is fast!! And it works fine with my sheet.

> > Yes, we should keep as much as possible to XSLT 1.0.  However, if it's
> > the <xsl:document> function which you're referring to it's actually a
> > common extension to many XSLT processors (and is in XSLT 1.1 I
> > believe).
>
> I was using Xalan's rewrite extension, but if xsl:document is more
> common (and supported by libxslt) I'll use that instead.

I found this on the net:

> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 12:08:02AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Multiple file output are extensions to the standard XSLT-1.0 . libxslt
> implements 4 syntaxes, the Xalan, XT, and Saxon's processors ones. But
> the one I recommend, is  the 4th one, from the XSLT-1.1 working draft.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt11/#multiple-output

So I've adapted the sheet and it uses xsl:document now.
I'm going to continue work now and will check in my results later on.

See you,

Julian




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]