Re: coreutils-9.3.147-d553ab on Alpine Linux

[Pádraig Brady]

On 27/08/2023 17:21, Dragan Simic wrote:
> On 2023-08-27 18:16, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > On 27/08/2023 17:06, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > > Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > > > Perhaps 'sleep' is a shell builtin here which is confusing things?
> > >
> > > Yes:
> > > $ type sleep
> > > sleep is a shell builtin
> > >
> > > > Does the following help (I don't have easy access to an alpine
> > > > system):
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt.sh
> > > > b/tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt.sh
> > > > index 3ffb7b0b1..f4f12136a 100755
> > > > --- a/tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt.sh
> > > > +++ b/tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt.sh
> > > > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ for prg in $built_programs; do
> > > >         '[' | expr | stty )
> > > >           continue;;
> > > >         # Wrap some utilities known by the shell by env.
> > > > -    echo | false | kill | printf | pwd | test | true )
> > > > +    echo | false | kill | printf | pwd | sleep | test | true )
> > > >           prg="env $prg";;
> > > >       esac
> > > >       checkprg $prg
> > >
> > > Yes. With this change, the failure disappears.
> >
> > Cool. Applied (as well as all your other coreutils and gnulib changes).
>
> Perhaps it would be a good idea to release an updated tarball in the
> next few days, so we can test again with the latest patches applied,
> just to make sure there are no regressions.

Right. I'm planning to do that once these last couple
of patches percolate for a while.

Will reply to the top level of this thread with the new tarball.

cheers,
Pádraig.