coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] fix descriptions for AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT


From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix descriptions for AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:29:48 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0

On 3/10/22 05:46, Pádraig Brady wrote:
After looking at the kernel code, it seems that:
   fstatat() did _not_ imply AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT from 2.6.38 -> 4.11
     I'm not sure it even honored the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT flag before 4.11
   fstatat() did imply AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT since 4.11

Ouch, so this whole thing has been a false alarm? Well, in some sense that's a relief; in another sense I wonder whether we should undo some of the recent Gnulib changes.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]