[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] dircolors: add alacritty(-direct) terminal types
From: |
Tycho Andersen |
Subject: |
[PATCH] dircolors: add alacritty(-direct) terminal types |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:47:25 -0700 |
In the spirit of 974848a4866f ("dircolors: add st/st-256color terminal
types") let's add alacritty as well. There was a previous attempt at this:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2019-05/msg00029.html
It seems as though Fedora has a package now for a couple releases at
least:
https://fedora.pkgs.org/34/fedora-x86_64/alacritty-0.7.2-2.fc34.x86_64.rpm.html
https://fedora.pkgs.org/35/fedora-aarch64/alacritty-0.9.0-1.fc35.aarch64.rpm.html
As for the original question of "why does alacritty need its own $TERM",
one argument is: because it implements a different set of features than any
existing common $TERM.
This differs slightly from the original in that it adds support for
alacritty*, since there are two common alacritty $TERMs, alacritty and
alacritty-direct.
---
src/dircolors.hin | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/dircolors.hin b/src/dircolors.hin
index 59a9b51d7..d73e8432e 100644
--- a/src/dircolors.hin
+++ b/src/dircolors.hin
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
# Below are TERM entries, which can be a glob patterns, to match
# against the TERM environment variable to determine if it is colorable.
TERM Eterm
+TERM alacritty*
TERM ansi
TERM *color*
TERM con[0-9]*x[0-9]*
base-commit: 4a0a8fdbec1f522f529801082e918c47e70166c0
--
2.32.0
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [PATCH] dircolors: add alacritty(-direct) terminal types,
Tycho Andersen <=