[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SV: Wish: checksumming *sum filter
From: |
Ole Tange |
Subject: |
SV: Wish: checksumming *sum filter |
Date: |
Fri, 10 May 2019 13:13:45 +0000 |
Pádraig wrote:
:
> The fact that *sum would need to consume/buffer all the input would mean that
> the parallelism
> from the rest of the pipe is lost (well I suppose the process startup
> overhead is parallelized).
Just like sort/wc and *sum if used in a pipe today:
cat file | sha256sum | ...
> I.E. it's functionally equivalent to:
>
> Get_untrused_input > /tmp/blah
> sha256sum -c <(echo "$chksum /tmp/blah") &&
> ...
> rm /tmp/blah
Yes, except you can do it on a read-only file system and in a shell that does
not support <().
/Ole