[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: w(1), who(1), last(1) and unix philosophy
From: |
Karel Zak |
Subject: |
Re: w(1), who(1), last(1) and unix philosophy |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jul 2018 14:53:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170912-66-504cd9 |
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 07:48:04PM +0200, kalle wrote:
> hello.
> with this mail I address e-mail-adresses related to the projects GNU
> coreutils, util-linux and procps.
>
> it seems to me, that the programs who(1) [belonging to GNU coreutils], w
> (1) [belonging to procps] and maybe also last(1) [belonging to
> util-linux] are giving out similar output.
> Wouldn't it make sense in the spirit of UNIX philosophy to have only one
> specialized command with the different capabilities included ??
Don't forget that UNIX is no one-source stuff. It has long history with
many parallel dialects, implementations and versions.
Yes, now it's mostly about GNU & Linux and we (the few projects) have
probably enough control to consolidate things, but backward compatibility
is more important in this case.
I guess w(1), last(1) and who(1) will be with us for ever.
Perfect is the enemy of good ;-)
Karel
--
Karel Zak <address@hidden>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
- w(1), who(1), last(1) and unix philosophy, kalle, 2018/07/03
- Re: w(1), who(1), last(1) and unix philosophy, David Both, 2018/07/03
- Re: w(1), who(1), last(1) and unix philosophy, David Both, 2018/07/03
- Re: w(1), who(1), last(1) and unix philosophy,
Karel Zak <=