Re: Please, use --check=crc32 or switch to a safe format

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:42:25PM +0200, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > Anyway the general point of this thread is that
> > fixing this with options to each generator of xz is not practical.
> > Either the default xz crc should be changed to crc32,
> > or more likely busybox xz would gain crc64 support.
> 
> Xz-utils and busybox are not the only xz implementations. Asking each xz 
> implementation to standardize on the same check type is as unpractical 

Why do you think so?


-- 
ldv