[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: broken ls in coreutils 8.25
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: broken ls in coreutils 8.25 |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 06:30:03 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 |
On 02/01/2016 11:17 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi Pádraig,
>
> On 02/01/16 17:07, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 31/01/16 06:48, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
>> The reasons we changed the default was:
>
>> - It only happens when outputting to terminals
>
> This means if you use "ls -1 | somescript" the script will
> not see the quoting style. Don't you think that this is
> inconsistent, not to mention that a script would benefit
> much more from this quoting style than a human?
No. ls _already_ behaves differently when not outputting to a terminal
(that is, 'ls | somescript' and 'ls -1 | somescript' behave the same,
because a non-terminal implies -1).
>
>> - It disambiguates the output for users
>
> This means that the user has to count '\' and "'" in the output
> of ls to get the "real" filename.
Yeah, but which are you more likely to do, retype the "real" filename
manually (and insert your own shell quoting as appropriate), or
copy-and-paste the existing output with a mouse click or two?
>
>> - Output can be pasted back in the shell for further processing
>
> This means that it useful only on a graphic terminal, for people
> using a mouse, but it affects all users using "ls"
These days, how many users are NOT using a graphical terminal? Again,
it only affects output to a terminal, and it is very easy to adjust your
login setups to change the defaults to something you like, so that
_your_ terminal behaves the way you want.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature