Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-8.20.113-1f1f4

[Bernhard Voelker]

On February 8, 2013 at 5:30 PM "Pádraig Brady" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 02:53 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> > On February 7, 2013 at 8:57 PM "Pádraig Brady" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > * SLES-10.3 (i586):
> >    gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20070115 (SUSE Linux)
> >
> >    FAIL: tests/tail-2/inotify-rotate.sh
> >          NFS issue during cleanup_
> >          reproduced: 2x out of 2 tries.
>
> If you put a "wait" before the "Exit" at the end of that test, does it help.
> As a less desirable solution we could put require_local_dir_ at the top
> of this test.

Unfortunately not:

+ for j in '$(seq 150)'
+ grep ok out
+ return 0
+ found=1
+ kill 27060
+ test 1 = 0
+ wait
+ Exit 0
+ set +e
+ exit 0
+ exit 0
+ remove_tmp_
+ __st=0
+ cleanup_
+ :
+ cd /homes/vb027591/depot/coreutils-8.20.113-1f1f4
+ chmod -R u+rwx
/homes/vb027591/depot/coreutils-8.20.113-1f1f4/gt-inotify-rotate.sh.aQIe
+ rm -rf
/homes/vb027591/depot/coreutils-8.20.113-1f1f4/gt-inotify-rotate.sh.aQIe
rm: cannot remove
'/homes/vb027591/depot/coreutils-8.20.113-1f1f4/gt-inotify-rotate.sh.aQIe/.nfs005d43e600000398':
Device or resource busy
rm: cannot remove
'/homes/vb027591/depot/coreutils-8.20.113-1f1f4/gt-inotify-rotate.sh.aQIe/.nfs005d43e70000039b':
Device or resource busy
rm: cannot remove
'/homes/vb027591/depot/coreutils-8.20.113-1f1f4/gt-inotify-rotate.sh.aQIe/.nfs005d43e80000039e':
Device or resource busy
rm: cannot remove
'/homes/vb027591/depot/coreutils-8.20.113-1f1f4/gt-inotify-rotate.sh.aQIe/.nfs005d43e2000003a1':
Device or resource busy
+ test 0 = 0
+ __st=1
+ exit 1


I even tried with

  + wait
  + sleep 5

but still "Device or resource busy". ;-(

Why do we need this in remove_tmp_ ()?

  # If removal fails and exit status was to be 0, then change it to 1.
  rm -rf "$test_dir_" || { test $__st = 0 && __st=1; }

> > * openSUSE-12.2 (x86_64):
> >    gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20070115 (SUSE Linux)
> >
> >    All 501 tests passed
> >    (37 tests were not run)
> >
> >    BUT 1 gnulib test failed (2x out of 2 times):
> >
> >    FAIL: test-utimensat (exit: 134)
> >    test-lutimens.h:64: assertion failed
>
> On NFS again?
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-10/threads.html#00291

No, that's a VirtualBox VM with no NFS mounts running on a Win7 host.
The file system is ext4 on plain /dev/sdb.

Have a nice day,
Berny