[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: factor tests: ugly long file names
|
From: |
Bernhard Voelker |
|
Subject: |
Re: factor tests: ugly long file names |
|
Date: |
Fri, 26 Oct 2012 01:28:09 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 |
On 10/26/2012 01:12 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> I was just wondering if we shouldn't refactor the new factor tests.
>
> They have ugly and long file names (the test data), and have identical content
> (which is redundancy which in turn should be avoided IMO):
>
> $ md5sum *.sh
> 31c3a9e8b5dad969dafd07c348c48233
> 0-10000000-a451244522b1b662c86cb3cbb55aee3e085a61a0.sh
> 31c3a9e8b5dad969dafd07c348c48233
> 10000000-20000000-c792a2e02f1c8536b5121f624b04039d20187016.sh
> [...]
> 31c3a9e8b5dad969dafd07c348c48233 run.sh
Opps, they are hard links ...
... but yet ugly in 'make check' output.
Have a nice day,
Berny
- factor tests: ugly long file names, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/10/25
- Re: factor tests: ugly long file names,
Bernhard Voelker <=
- Re: factor tests: ugly long file names, Jim Meyering, 2012/10/26
- Re: factor tests: ugly long file names, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/10/26
- Re: factor tests: ugly long file names, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/10/26
- Re: factor tests: ugly long file names, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/10/26
- Re: factor tests: ugly long file names, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/10/27
- Re: factor tests: ugly long file names, Jim Meyering, 2012/10/27
- Re: factor tests: ugly long file names, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/10/27
- Re: factor tests: ugly long file names, Jim Meyering, 2012/10/27
- Re: factor tests: ugly long file names, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/10/27
- Re: factor tests: ugly long file names, Jim Meyering, 2012/10/27