[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] maint: cleanup size determination in sort [was: overly aggre
From: |
Jeff Janes |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] maint: cleanup size determination in sort [was: overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c] |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:38:01 -0700 |
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
> Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>> Here's a patch to move the code regarding physical/available/total
>> memory down to where it's used (on top of your patch).
>
> Thanks. I've pushed that -- tweaked to move the rlimit declaration down, too:
The committed version does not include the limit to no more than 75%
of physical memory. Was that intentional or an oversight?
Cheers,
Jeff
- overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c, Jeff Janes, 2012/06/07
- Re: overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c, Pádraig Brady, 2012/06/07
- Re: overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c, Jim Meyering, 2012/06/11
- Re: overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/11
- Re: overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/11
- RE: overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c, Voelker, Bernhard, 2012/06/11
- Re: overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/11
- [PATCH] maint: cleanup size determination in sort [was: overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c], Bernhard Voelker, 2012/06/14
- Re: [PATCH] maint: cleanup size determination in sort [was: overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c], Jim Meyering, 2012/06/20
- Re: [PATCH] maint: cleanup size determination in sort [was: overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c],
Jeff Janes <=
- Re: [PATCH] maint: cleanup size determination in sort [was: overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c], Jim Meyering, 2012/06/20
- Re: [PATCH] maint: cleanup size determination in sort [was: overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c], Paul Eggert, 2012/06/20
- Re: overly aggressive memory usage by sort.c, Jeff Janes, 2012/06/12